top of page

Beyond Disorder: Understanding Trauma "Symptoms" as Adaptive Responses

Fight, Flight, Flee, Flop: Understanding Trauma Responses

In the intricate tapestry of human psychology, the way we interpret and respond to trauma profoundly impacts our approach to healing. Traditional medical models have often categorized the manifestations of trauma — such as hypervigilance, avoidance, and emotional dysregulation — as symptoms of disorders. This pathologized view, while providing a framework for diagnosis and treatment, can sometimes obscure the fundamentally adaptive nature of these responses. By reframing our understanding of trauma "symptoms" as adaptive responses and meaningful communications, we can foster a more compassionate and effective approach to healing.

The Nature of Trauma Responses

Trauma responses are not arbitrary. They are deeply rooted in our biological and psychological mechanisms for survival. When faced with danger, the human body and mind adapt in ways that enhance our ability to protect ourselves. Hypervigilance, for example, is a heightened state of awareness that can help individuals detect threats more readily. While in a safe environment, this may seem excessive or pathological, in the context of ongoing or past danger, it is a rational adaptation (van der Kolk, 2015).

Similarly, avoidance behaviors can be seen as a means of self-preservation, minimizing exposure to triggers that evoke the trauma. Emotional numbing and dissociation can serve as psychological protective measures, helping individuals cope with overwhelming pain by distancing themselves from their feelings.

Reframing Trauma Responses

The reframing of trauma responses as adaptive rather than pathological requires a paradigm shift in both clinical practice and societal attitudes. This perspective emphasizes understanding the individual's experience from their point of view, recognizing their responses as rational within their context. It shifts the focus from what is "wrong" with the person to what happened to them and how they adapted to survive (Fisher, 2017).

This approach encourages a more holistic view of the individual, taking into account the complexity of human resilience and the diverse ways people cope with adversity. It also opens the door to a broader range of therapeutic interventions, beyond medication and traditional psychotherapy, to include methods that honor and work with the body's natural adaptive processes.

Communicative Aspects of Trauma Responses

Trauma responses can also be understood as forms of communication. For individuals who have experienced trauma, especially those for whom the trauma occurred in relational contexts (such as abuse or neglect), these responses may represent attempts to communicate unmet needs, boundaries, or the reality of their experiences in the only way they feel possible.

Recognizing these responses as communicative acts allows therapists, caregivers, and loved ones to listen more deeply to what the trauma survivor is trying to convey. It invites a dialogue that can lead to a more profound understanding and validation of the survivor's experiences, which is a crucial step in the healing process.

The Role of Meaning-Making

Central to transforming trauma responses from pathological symptoms to adaptive communications is the process of meaning-making. This involves integrating the traumatic experience into the individual's life narrative in a way that acknowledges their strength and resilience. It can also include exploring how the trauma has led to personal growth, changes in perspective, or a deepened understanding of self and others (Tedeschi & Calhoun, 2004).

Meaning making is not about finding a "silver lining" in trauma but about recognizing the complexity of the human experience, including the capacity to find strength in vulnerability and growth in adversity. It is a deeply individual process that can be facilitated through various therapeutic modalities, including narrative therapy, art therapy, and mindfulness practices.

Supporting Adaptive Responses

Supporting individuals in their healing journey means recognizing and validating their adaptive responses to trauma. It involves creating safe spaces where trauma survivors can explore their experiences and responses without judgment. This can be achieved through trauma-informed care practices that prioritize safety, choice, collaboration, and empowerment (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2014).

Therapeutic interventions that focus on body-based healing, such as somatic experiencing or trauma-sensitive yoga, can help individuals reconnect with their bodies in a safe and supportive way. These approaches acknowledge the body's role in trauma response and recovery, offering paths to healing that align with the body's natural adaptive mechanisms.

Moving Beyond Pathologization

Moving beyond the pathologization of trauma responses requires a collective effort across the mental health field, educational systems, and society at large. It calls for increased awareness and understanding of trauma's impact on human experience, as well as a commitment to approaches that honor the individual's strength, resilience, and capacity for healing.

By reframing our understanding of trauma responses as adaptive and communicative, we can foster a more compassionate and effective approach to healing. This perspective not only benefits individuals who have experienced trauma but also enriches our collective understanding of human resilience and the profound capacity for growth and transformation.

Understanding trauma responses as adaptive and communicative offers a more compassionate and holistic approach to healing. It recognizes the strength and resilience inherent in the human capacity to survive and adapt to challenging circumstances. By reframing these responses, we can support individuals in their healing journey in a way that honors their experiences and promotes growth and transformation. This paradigm shift in understanding trauma invites us to listen more deeply, respond more thoughtfully, and support more effectively, paving the way for a more inclusive and healing-oriented society.

For professionals working with trauma survivors, integrating this nuanced understanding of trauma responses is essential for providing effective, compassionate care. The NeuroNarrative Approach™, developed by Trey Malicoat, offers a comprehensive framework for understanding and treating trauma that honors the adaptive nature of trauma responses and empowers individuals to reclaim their narratives. To learn more about how you can master the NeuroNarrative Approach™ and expand your skillset, visit Explore classes, coaching, retreats, and intensives designed to equip you with the tools and insights needed to guide your clients toward profound healing and resilience.




  • Fisher, J. (2017). Healing the fragmented selves of trauma survivors: Overcoming internal self-alienation. Routledge.

  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2014). SAMHSA's concept of trauma and guidance for a trauma-informed approach. HHS Publication No. (SMA) 14-4884. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

  • Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1-18.

  • van der Kolk, B. A. (2015). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Penguin Books.

8 views0 comments


bottom of page