top of page

Asking others to Manage your emotional triggers is irresponsible!

Fight, Flight, Flee, Flop: Understanding Trauma Responses

In an era marked by increasing awareness of mental health issues and trauma, the concept of "triggers"—specific stimuli that evoke intense emotional responses in individuals—has become a focal point in both personal and public discourse. The rise of trigger warnings and the call for accommodations in various sectors reflect a growing sensitivity towards the experiences of those grappling with trauma. However, this shift also sparks a complex debate about the balance between accommodating sensitivities and fostering resilience, leading to what some describe as a culture of "trigger irresponsibility." This article explores the social impact of this phenomenon and the implications of a culture increasingly predicated on the need for accommodation.

Understanding Triggers and Their Impact

Triggers can be diverse, ranging from words, images, and sounds to situations that remind individuals of past trauma, leading to reactions such as anxiety, fear, or reliving traumatic events. The acknowledgment of triggers and their effects is crucial in understanding mental health and supporting those affected. However, the growing demand for trigger warnings and accommodations across various platforms and environments—academic settings, workplaces, social media, public discourse, and entertainment—raises questions about the broader societal implications.

The Rise of Trigger Warnings in Academia

In academic circles, the demand for trigger warnings on course content that could potentially distress students has ignited a debate about the purpose of education and intellectual growth. Proponents argue that such warnings are necessary to create a supportive learning environment for all students, particularly those with traumatic histories. Critics, however, contend that an overemphasis on avoiding potentially triggering content may inhibit intellectual challenge and exploration, essential components of higher education. They argue that it may contribute to a culture of avoidance, rather than engagement with and critical thinking about challenging ideas and realities (Lukianoff & Haidt, 2018).

Workplace Dynamics and Mental Health Awareness

The conversation around mental health has extended into the professional realm, with discussions about creating trauma-informed workplaces that recognize and support employees' mental health needs. While these initiatives are crucial in fostering supportive environments, they also present dilemmas when individuals decline specific tasks, citing potential triggers. This situation highlights the challenge of balancing respect and accommodation for individual needs with the collective efficiency and goals vital for organizational success. The quest for equitable solutions underscores the need for nuanced understanding and implementation of trauma-informed practices (Frazier et al., 2015).

Social Media: A Double-Edged Sword

The digital landscape of social media has become a battleground for narratives where individuals share their experiences and expect a global audience to navigate their triggers sensitively. While this has led to the creation of supportive communities, it also poses challenges in content moderation and the expectation of universal sensitivity. This scenario exemplifies the complexities of fostering a compassionate community while encouraging resilience and personal responsibility in the vast and unpredictable terrains of the internet.

Public Discourse, Activism, and Free Expression

The rise of activism and heightened sensitivity in public discourse around various social issues has seen an increase in demands for trigger warnings in speeches, events, and publications. While aiming to create inclusive spaces, there is concern that such practices may limit free expression and robust debate. Striking a balance between sensitivity to trauma and maintaining a dynamic public discourse is a growing challenge, reflecting broader societal tensions between accommodation and the need for open, challenging conversations.

The Entertainment Industry and Consumer Content

Demands for content warnings and the ability to filter out triggering material in the entertainment industry reflect a desire for control over exposure to distressing content. This movement raises questions about the impact of creative freedom and the role of art in reflecting and challenging societal norms. The debate centers on finding a middle ground where art can remain provocative and transformative while being mindful of the audience's potential trauma (Lothian, 2016).

Navigating the Fine Line: Empathy vs. Resilience

The societal shift towards increased accommodation for triggers is underscored by a noble intention to be more empathetic and inclusive. However, it also brings to light concerns about fostering a culture of "trigger irresponsibility," where the onus of managing one's emotional reactions is increasingly placed on external entities rather than on individuals' coping mechanisms and resilience. This raises critical questions about the long-term implications for personal growth, societal engagement, and the collective ability to confront and navigate complex, often uncomfortable realities.

The debate does not present easy answers but calls for a nuanced approach that respects individual experiences of trauma while also promoting resilience and the capacity to engage with life's inherent challenges. Advocates for mental health argue that understanding and accommodations can coexist with encouraging personal responsibility and resilience-building. They suggest that rather than viewing trigger warnings and accommodations as fostering avoidance, they can be seen as part of a broader strategy that includes support for developing coping skills, emotional regulation, and resilience (McNally, 2017).

Practical Steps Forward

Addressing the social impact of trigger irresponsibility and the culture of accommodation requires a multifaceted approach:

  1. Education and Awareness: Increasing awareness about trauma, its effects, and the importance of resilience can foster a more informed public discourse. Educational initiatives should focus on equipping individuals with knowledge about mental health, coping strategies, and the value of facing challenges as part of growth.

  2. Balanced Implementations of Accommodations: In settings like universities and workplaces, accommodations can be designed to respect individual needs without compromising the core objectives of education and productivity. This might include offering support services, alternative content, or tasks, while also encouraging engagement with challenging materials or situations in a supportive environment.

  3. Encouraging Personal Responsibility: While societal support is vital, there is also a need to encourage individuals to take responsibility for their healing and growth. This includes seeking therapy, building personal coping strategies, and gradually facing triggers in safe and controlled ways to build resilience.

  4. Dialogue and Open Conversations: Creating spaces for open dialogue about the complexities of triggers, accommodations, and resilience can help bridge divides and foster a more nuanced understanding of these issues. Engaging in conversations that respect diverse perspectives and experiences can lead to more inclusive and effective solutions.

  5. Research and Continuous Learning: Ongoing research into the impacts of trigger warnings, accommodations, and strategies for resilience can provide evidence-based guidelines for individuals, institutions, and society at large. This research should aim to understand the long-term effects of different approaches on mental health, personal growth, and societal well-being.

The social impact of trigger irresponsibility and the culture requiring accommodation reflects broader societal challenges in navigating the complexities of trauma, mental health, and resilience. While the path forward requires balancing empathy with the promotion of resilience, it also calls for a collective commitment to understanding, supporting, and empowering individuals to navigate their triggers and contribute to a more inclusive and robust society. As we move forward, the goal should not be to shield ourselves from every potential trigger but to build a society where individuals are supported in their healing journeys and empowered to face life's challenges with strength and resilience.

For professionals working with individuals navigating triggers and trauma, the NeuroNarrative Approach™ offers a comprehensive framework for supporting the healing process while fostering resilience and personal responsibility. Developed by Trey Malicoat, this approach combines the transformative power of narrative therapy with the insights of neuroscience and somatic experiencing, providing a holistic path toward empowerment and growth. To learn more about how you can master the NeuroNarrative Approach™ and expand your skill set, visit Explore classes, coaching, retreats, and intensives designed to equip you with the tools and insights needed to guide your clients toward profound healing and personal transformation.




  • Frazier, P., Greer, C., Gabrielsen, S., & Manne, S. (2015). Implementing trauma-focused interventions in the workplace: Issues and strategies. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 30(1-2), 127-146.

  • Lothian, A. (2016). Choose not to warn: Trigger warnings and content notes from fan culture to feminist pedagogy. Feminist Studies, 42(3), 743-756.

  • Lukianoff, G., & Haidt, J. (2018). The coddling of the American mind: How good intentions and bad ideas are setting up a generation for failure. Penguin Press.

  • McNally, R. J. (2017). Hazards ahead: The problem with trigger warnings, according to the research. Pacific Standard. Retrieved from

5 views0 comments


bottom of page